'Right to withdraw' periods
The peer-to-peer lending sector is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The FCA rules include mandating all peer-to-peer lending platforms to offer borrowers a 14-day 'right to withdraw' period, during which they can withdraw from their agreements without penalty if they change their minds.
Here at Lending Works we are fully supportive of the FCA regulation, and in particular anything which allows consumers to make more informed financial decisions. In fact, Lending Works already provided its borrowers with a 14-day right to withdraw period before the FCA rules were even in place. We hope this mandatory right to withdraw period will encourage more people to consider using peer-to-peer lending platforms over traditional financial institutions.
How it works
Once loan agreements have been formed, borrowers have 14 calendar days from the start date of their agreement during which they can cancel without penalty. They can do this in any one of the following ways:
- Email us at email@example.com
- Call our Customer Services team on 020 7096 8512
- Write to us at 60 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8AQ
Once we receive notice that you wish to cancel your agreement, we will ask for amounts borrowed to be returned to us. Once we receive the funds our system will automatically unwind your contracts - lenders will automatically receive back all amounts lent and we will reimburse any fees charged.
Did you know?
Legally, lenders are allowed to charge interest from the start of your agreement up to the date notice is given by you to cancel your agreement. The vast majority of lenders will do this, however Lending Works will not charge interest during this period and all fees will be reimbursed by us so that no one is out of pocket. We believe this is fair for everyone.
Need more information?
If you would like further information please do not hesitate to get in touch with us using the contact details provided in the Contact Us section at the top of this page.
Our website offers information about saving, investing, tax and other financial matters, but not personal advice. If you're not sure whether peer-to-peer lending is right for you, please seek independent financial advice, and if you decide to invest with Lending Works, please read our Key Lender Information PDF first.
With the retail sector enduring its fair share of challenges, companies are looking at new ways to attract customers, and drive conversion. In an overcrowded, dog-eat-dog marketplace, with behemoths such as Amazon flexing their muscle, it’s easier said than done.
On 4 June 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) released its new regulatory framework for peer-to-peer lending (P2P); a Policy Statement known as PS19/14. As you might imagine, it's a document which, following a three-month consultation, is a hefty read of no fewer than 102 pages.
For all the resilience the UK economy has shown, there is no doubt that this year's ISA season is set against a backdrop of uncertainty. Whatever the pros and cons, Brexit, and a lack of clarity on what our future economic relationship with the EU will look like, has left us at a crossroads.
In a difficult climate, customer acquisition and lead generation present stern challenges for UK retailers, and a great deal of marketing spend invariably gets directed towards getting feet through the door.
Over the last decade, there can be little dispute that the reputation of mainstream banks – and particularly the so-called ‘Big Four’ (HSBC, Barclays, Lloyds and RBS) – is at its lowest ebb.
The peer-to-peer (P2P) lending industry is now regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The regulatory framework has been designed to protect customers and promote effective competition.
When you earn interest from a regular bank savings account, for example, the bank automatically deducts basic rate tax (currently 20%) before paying your interest. With interest earned from peer-to-peer lending, tax is not deducted automatically so lenders will need to declare their income to HMRC.
The financial crisis is a bitter memory of what can go wrong when regulators lose control of markets. It seems hard to fathom now, but a little over a decade ago, buyers could acquire mortgages to the tune of 125 per cent of the home’s value (the Northern Rock Together mortgage being one of the most infamous), with only the most lax affordability checks standing in their way.
Numerous theories have emerged as to why the UK has endured such a severe productivity problem over the last decade. Growth in productivity of just 2 per cent during that period would typically have been accomplished within a single year prior to the financial crisis, and thus the 'productivity puzzle' continues to confound economists
In the aftermath of the financial crisis back in 2008/09, the Bank of England (BoE) had considerable headroom in terms of monetary policy, and - rightly - it made full use of it.
It’s no exaggeration to say that the global financial system as a whole is predicated on the ability to buy something now, and pay for it later. Barely anyone would be able to make a substantial purchase such as a house without an instrument like a mortgage.
With political parties jostling for position amid a series of Elections, and the ongoing spectre of a snap General Election looming large, the Labour Party put forward a policy last week which has proved to be a talking point: increasing the minimum wage to £10 per hour, and extending this to workers under the age of 18.