With the retail sector enduring its fair share of challenges, companies are looking at new ways to attract customers, and drive conversion. In an overcrowded, dog-eat-dog marketplace, with behemoths such as Amazon flexing their muscle, it’s easier said than done.
Retirement and pensions: evolving with the times
The concept of retirement is one which many people believe is as old as the hills. Yet while there are glimmering traces of pensions being paid in the BC era (Augustus offered later-life funding to Roman soldiers), it is widely accepted that the pioneer of the pension was Otto von Bismarck. Better renowned for his military acumen, as German Chancellor he came up with the revolutionary idea of paying government pensions to disabled workers and older members of society back in 1881. The reason it was considered revolutionary was that, at the time, people simply did not retire.
In Britain, the state pension – then known as the ‘old age’ pension – was first introduced in 1908. Men over the age of 70 were entitled to five shillings a week (about £15 in today’s terms). However, given that average life expectancy at the time was just 47, this benefit was enjoyed by precious few.
Workplace pensions arguably date slightly further back to 1874, when injured nurses were given an annual payout of £15. For the next 60 years however, it remained a niche concept reserved for certain (male) manual and public-sector workers. Only since 1948 has the state pension become mandatory, and the workplace pension more common.
The future of work
The point of the above is that pensions, and even retirement, are both still brand new. And even in the brief history of retirement, pensions have evolved considerably. So, while many of us take for granted that we will retire at 65, and enjoy an average of 20 golden years without having to work, the reality is that there is limited precedent for this, and the future of retirement is a moving target. Rapid increases in life expectancy mean the costs of both the state pension and tax relief on workplace pensions are putting enormous strain on government budgets. And with the UK in particular still running up significant fiscal debt, something simply has to give.
In all likelihood, that will mean a sustained increase in the commonly-accepted retirement age, and already we are starting to see a shift. Nearly 15 per cent of men in our country over the age of 65, and roughly 8 per cent of women, are still in work. This trend is likely to continue, given the degree to which life expectancy has soared. In 2015, it had risen to 80 for men and 83 for women, while babies born after the year 2000 are predicted to have a 50 per cent chance of living until the age of 105. Only a lucky few will be equipped to fund a 40-year retirement, especially with the state pension age set to increase sooner than expected. The rest of us will simply have to work longer.
Will attitudes keep up?
A big question is whether attitudes of employers, and even colleagues, will keep pace with an ageing workforce. In the digital world we live in, many workers of an older disposition are assumed to be at a disadvantage, so any lingering prejudices will not help the cause of keeping them in work. According to a study by charity Age UK, around 65 per cent of older people believe that age-based discrimination is rife in the workplace. It also found that around 40 per cent of workers between the age of 35 and 50 get sufficient in-work training, whereas this figure drops to 18 per cent for over 50s.
In a fast-moving world, where career changes, by necessity, are more common, it is vital that the value which more experienced workers can bring to the table is not ignored. And with the inevitable lengthening of careers, there is greater scope for return on investment in older workers for employers to boot.
Savvy planning can save the day
While working for longer will be unavoidable, and perhaps slightly unpalatable, for many people, there is a way to maximise both the length of time and financial security of your retirement: shrewd saving. Courtesy of auto-enrolment, employees (and most contractors) are able to benefit from significant employer contributions towards a pension pot. If possible, it is certainly worth matching the maximum employer contribution, as this increases both your retirement saving and income tax relief.
Yet many experts believe consumers should look to save between 15-20 per cent of their annual income for retirement, so it is unlikely that a workplace pension alone will cover this (unless you contribute over and above this maximum employer contribution). As such, squirrelling money away for later life is essential.
But it isn’t just the amount you save which matters: it’s also the return you earn on this ring-fenced money. Easier said than done, given that inflation continues to increase, and interest rates remain stubbornly low. However, it has been a strong year for many who have invested in the stock market, while peer-to-peer lending offers inflation-beating returns with lower levels of risk. It is thus advisable to contemplate alternatives to grow your money before simply putting it in the bank and watching it erode in real terms.
An uncertain future
As we've alluded to above, pension laws are always subject to change, and for the Treasury, this saving mechanism presents a soft (and lucrative) target if the coffers need to be filled. And as long as interest rates and annuity rates remain low, those planning for retirement - and those already of retirement age - are likely to come under pressure.
Then again, the advent of technologies such as Artificial Intelligence and fintech could well bring immense wealth to the economy as a whole. We are also living longer, goods and services are getting cheaper, and quality of life has never been better. There is a lot to be cheerful about, and one shouldn't fall foul to the doom-mongers.
Nevertheless, the future of retirement, and what the norms will be in this respect over the next few decades is very uncertain. As such, it is essential that you keep one eye on the future, and start planning for retirement as early as possible so that your golden years can be filled with fun, relaxation and plenty of special memories with your loved ones.
Our website offers information about saving, investing, tax and other financial matters, but not personal advice. If you're not sure whether peer-to-peer lending is right for you, please seek independent financial advice, and if you decide to invest with Lending Works, please read our Key Lender Information PDF first.
On 4 June 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) released its new regulatory framework for peer-to-peer lending (P2P); a Policy Statement known as PS19/14. As you might imagine, it's a document which, following a three-month consultation, is a hefty read of no fewer than 102 pages.
For all the resilience the UK economy has shown, there is no doubt that this year's ISA season is set against a backdrop of uncertainty. Whatever the pros and cons, Brexit, and a lack of clarity on what our future economic relationship with the EU will look like, has left us at a crossroads.
In a difficult climate, customer acquisition and lead generation present stern challenges for UK retailers, and a great deal of marketing spend invariably gets directed towards getting feet through the door.
Over the last decade, there can be little dispute that the reputation of mainstream banks – and particularly the so-called ‘Big Four’ (HSBC, Barclays, Lloyds and RBS) – is at its lowest ebb.
The peer-to-peer (P2P) lending industry is now regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The regulatory framework has been designed to protect customers and promote effective competition.
When you earn interest from a regular bank savings account, for example, the bank automatically deducts basic rate tax (currently 20%) before paying your interest. With interest earned from peer-to-peer lending, tax is not deducted automatically so lenders will need to declare their income to HMRC.
The financial crisis is a bitter memory of what can go wrong when regulators lose control of markets. It seems hard to fathom now, but a little over a decade ago, buyers could acquire mortgages to the tune of 125 per cent of the home’s value (the Northern Rock Together mortgage being one of the most infamous), with only the most lax affordability checks standing in their way.
Numerous theories have emerged as to why the UK has endured such a severe productivity problem over the last decade. Growth in productivity of just 2 per cent during that period would typically have been accomplished within a single year prior to the financial crisis, and thus the 'productivity puzzle' continues to confound economists
In the aftermath of the financial crisis back in 2008/09, the Bank of England (BoE) had considerable headroom in terms of monetary policy, and - rightly - it made full use of it.
It’s no exaggeration to say that the global financial system as a whole is predicated on the ability to buy something now, and pay for it later. Barely anyone would be able to make a substantial purchase such as a house without an instrument like a mortgage.
With political parties jostling for position amid a series of Elections, and the ongoing spectre of a snap General Election looming large, the Labour Party put forward a policy last week which has proved to be a talking point: increasing the minimum wage to £10 per hour, and extending this to workers under the age of 18.