The Spring Budget in review
An upbeat Budget? One of prudence? One of tax raiding? Or one of ‘utter complacency’? Political commentators and critics will take from it what they will, as is the case with any Budget address. But conspicuous by their absence in Chancellor Philip Hammond’s first (and final) Spring Budget were the rabbits out of hats we’d grown accustomed to from his predecessor.
Indeed, the core of Hammond’s speech in the House of Commons and the tones he struck fell almost exactly into line with expert predictions beforehand. The cautious optimism from improved economic performance and growth predictions. The increased windfall from tax receipts, and reduction in overall borrowing. The lack of giveaways. The frugality in the face of looming Brexit uncertainty. It all went like clockwork.
Perhaps the biggest surprise of all was the charisma with which he addressed the house, and his marginally-humorous jibes in the direction of the opposition benches.
Nevertheless, there was still plenty of interesting food for thought, and a few headline grabbers which need to be digested. Here are Budget 2017’s key takeaways with respect to personal finance:
Focus on the public finances
Hammond certainly did justice to his nickname of ‘spreadsheet Phil’. Despite better-than-expected headroom as a result of increased tax receipts and significantly reduced forecasts for borrowing, the Chancellor made clear that he would not be splashing the cash. The increase in borrowing for 2016/17 may have come in at £51.7bn - £16.4bn less than forecast – with the figure set to fall to an even more respectable £20.6bn by 2020/21. But the reality is that a national debt of £1.7tn remains a terrifying spectre (one which costs £46bn a year to service), and it is difficult to dispute the necessity for dealing with it decisively.
Few issues will ever unite all wings of the media, but the looming business rates increases, and the largely arbitrary determinants thereof, was enough to have both left and right up in arms. Understandably so, and with the fabric of our high streets under threat, it came as no surprise that Hammond announced a £435m package for firms affected by increases in rates - £300m of which will be reserved for those worst affected. Furthermore, increases for firms who lose out on small business rate relief will be capped at £50 a month, while pubs with a rateable value below £100,000 will be in line for a £1,000 discount on rates they pay.
An attack on the self-employed
Easily the most controversial announcement was a hike in class 4 National Insurance payments for the self-employed; currently at nine per cent, but rising to 11 per cent by April 2019. It all but breaks a pledge from the Conservatives’ 2015 manifesto, and one can’t help but wonder whether doing so represents poor PR, given that the net gains for the Treasury will be a relatively meagre £145m per year (factoring in reductions to class 2 NICs). Hammond offered detailed rationale for the hike, which equates to a net average increase of just 60p a week per self-employed individual, but many will be left seething.
Tax-free dividend allowance slashed
For the self-employed and pensioners alike, the biggest blow of all will have been the news that the tax-free dividend allowance for shareholders and directors of small private firms will be cut by more than half from £5,000 to £2,000 next year. For those who rely on these annual cash payments in their retirement, the ramifications are significant. Yet what will go some way to offsetting this news was the confirmation that the annual ISA allowance will be increasing to £20,000 for 2017/18, which, in turn, is a big boost for those looking to make use of an Innovative Finance ISA.
The personal allowance and NS&I savings bond
As the NIC increase for the self-employed showed, pledges from politicians aren’t always delivered upon in practice. It was thus reassuring that the personal tax-free allowance would still be rising as planned to £11,500 for 2017/18, and increasing to £12,500 by 2020. There was also confirmation for beleaguered savers that the NS&I savings bond, which was first announced at last year’s Autumn Statement, will launch in April, with a promised rate of 2.2 per cent for those willing to tie up their savings for three years.
A job well done?
There were some other talking points involving social care, education and investment in infrastructure and technologies which will inevitably attract both negative and favourable press. The only guarantee with any address at the despatch box is that there is simply no chance of pleasing, or even placating, everyone.
The harsh reality is that, at the best of times, a Chancellor has limited room for manoeuvre when it comes to spending, and Hammond’s address against a backdrop of debt, low productivity and macroeconomic uncertainty meant he was more hamstrung than most who’ve held the iconic briefcase aloft in years gone by. There were no handouts or shenanigans, but a number of important boxes were ticked, and the Chancellor conveyed the message that the economic outlook is better than expected, and that the UK is on a relatively good footing.
Given such mitigations, Hammond may well feel entitled to reflect on a job well done. Yet there is likely to be blowback from the self-employed, and proponents of aspiration. And unlike George Osborne, he also did little to signal any significant support for fintech and SMEs, which are so crucial to the British economy. As such, many may argue that the Chancellor’s Budget lacked the dynamism that will be needed as we embark upon the post-EU journey that lies ahead.
Our website offers information about saving, investing, tax and other financial matters, but not personal advice. If you're not sure whether peer-to-peer lending is right for you, please seek independent financial advice, and if you decide to invest with Lending Works, please read our Key Lender Information PDF first.
Since opening our doors back in 2014, we’ve always prided ourselves on living and breathing two key principles at Lending Works: innovation, and putting the customer first in everything we do.
With the retail sector enduring its fair share of challenges, companies are looking at new ways to attract customers, and drive conversion. In an overcrowded, dog-eat-dog marketplace, with behemoths such as Amazon flexing their muscle, it’s easier said than done.
On 4 June 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) released its new regulatory framework for peer-to-peer lending (P2P); a Policy Statement known as PS19/14. As you might imagine, it's a document which, following a three-month consultation, is a hefty read of no fewer than 102 pages.
In a difficult climate, customer acquisition and lead generation present stern challenges for UK retailers, and a great deal of marketing spend invariably gets directed towards getting feet through the door.
Over the last decade, there can be little dispute that the reputation of mainstream banks – and particularly the so-called ‘Big Four’ (HSBC, Barclays, Lloyds and RBS) – is at its lowest ebb.
The peer-to-peer (P2P) lending industry is now regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The regulatory framework has been designed to protect customers and promote effective competition.
Last week we took stock of the labour market, with the latest Office for National Statistics (ONS) data showing that the tide may be beginning to turn on Britain's so-called 'jobs miracle'. Unemployment ticked up to 3.9 per cent for June to August (an increase of 0.1 per cent), with the number of people in work falling by 56,000.
Whenever discussion turns to Britain’s misfiring property market, the words ‘stamp duty’ are seldom far away. Indeed, over the past two decades, it’s been something of a political football – one which has had a profound impact on both housing transactions, and the coffers at the Treasury.
In recent months, it’s been interesting to observe the reception to Greta Thunberg, the 16-year old climate change activist who has been afforded some high-profile forums. The impassioned viewpoints she has shared have earned her legions of fans, albeit no shortage of detractors too. In particular, a speech at the United Nations climate change summit stirred fractious debate.