As a platform, we take great pride in all that we've achieved since opening our doors for business nearly six years ago. We’ve
Deflation, and a more expensive life
So, which is it? Are we really in deflation and becoming better off, or are we shelling out more to keep ourselves going?
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) released their figures for the month of September, and it was confirmed that we are indeed a nation in deflation once again, with consumer prices having dipped by -0.1 per cent. It now leaves inflation in line with the lowest level seen in the UK economy since 1960, and continues the downward trend of recent years.
Supermarket price wars and plummeting fuel prices have been the main contributors to this so-called “noflation”, which has persisted for much of 2015. Yet as a consumer’s basket of goods has either remained the same or got cheaper, so too has their pay packet risen, with data released in midweek showing that real wage growth has hit its highest levels since the financial crisis struck seven years ago.
Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne was understandably on hand to bask in this triumph, which, ultimately, is good news for members of the public.
Indeed, with core inflation (which excludes more volatile components such as food and energy) at a healthy 1.1 per cent, concern among economists that we are entering dangerous territory in terms of deflation is minimal, with many believing inflation will actually return in the coming months as commodity prices appear to have bottomed out.
So, all is well in the state of Utopia then?
Not exactly. Only a week ago Bacs, the organisation behind the direct debit system in the UK, published results of its ‘Bill Tracker’ which analysed over 100 million transactions, looking for changes in payments made from consumer accounts for the previous eight years. The basket of ‘goods’ for analysis included standard direct debit bills such as council tax, energy, water, mortgages and rent, broadband, household insurance and TV licencing, and results showed that the average amount spent has shot up from £565 in mid-2007 to £668 in June 2015.
This represents an increase of 18%, and, given that over 70% of household bills are paid by direct debit, it’s a sample size that warrants a significant degree of credibility.
So, why the discrepancy to the above? Why are we paying more for bills like these, when all the disinflationary statistics say we should be paying less? After all, energy prices, for example, are inextricably linked to oil and fuel costs. So why have energy prices not fallen in proportion to their rapid decline?
Are we being robbed blind?
One must remember to consider that we’re not quite comparing apples and apples here, and direct comparisons between the ONS figures for CPI and those released by Bill Tracker cannot be made without certain caveats; not least of all the fact that the respective baskets contain different items. But it’s clear that the benefits of stable, or even declining prices are not entirely being passed on to UK consumers.
Solutions to such ‘rinsing’ have ranged from changing energy providers to nationalising them, but public discontent with the rising costs of keeping households going is something that isn’t likely to dissipate unless the disparity between the CPI and soaring bills is reduced in the near future.
- Deflation: Cheer or fear?
- Corbynomics, Clinton-Greenspan and Lady Luck
- What will a rate rise mean for P2P lending?
Get email updates for future blogs:
Our website offers information about saving, investing, tax and other financial matters, but not personal advice. If you're not sure whether peer-to-peer lending is right for you, please seek independent financial advice, and if you decide to invest with Lending Works, please read our Key Lender Information PDF first.
Since opening our doors back in 2014, we’ve always prided ourselves on living and breathing two key principles at Lending Works: innovation, and putting the customer first in everything we do.
With the retail sector enduring its fair share of challenges, companies are looking at new ways to attract customers, and drive conversion. In an overcrowded, dog-eat-dog marketplace, with behemoths such as Amazon flexing their muscle, it’s easier said than done.
On 4 June 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) released its new regulatory framework for peer-to-peer lending (P2P); a Policy Statement known as PS19/14. As you might imagine, it's a document which, following a three-month consultation, is a hefty read of no fewer than 102 pages.
In a difficult climate, customer acquisition and lead generation present stern challenges for UK retailers, and a great deal of marketing spend invariably gets directed towards getting feet through the door.
Over the last decade, there can be little dispute that the reputation of mainstream banks – and particularly the so-called ‘Big Four’ (HSBC, Barclays, Lloyds and RBS) – is at its lowest ebb.
The peer-to-peer (P2P) lending industry is now regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The regulatory framework has been designed to protect customers and promote effective competition.
Last week we took stock of the labour market, with the latest Office for National Statistics (ONS) data showing that the tide may be beginning to turn on Britain's so-called 'jobs miracle'. Unemployment ticked up to 3.9 per cent for June to August (an increase of 0.1 per cent), with the number of people in work falling by 56,000.
Whenever discussion turns to Britain’s misfiring property market, the words ‘stamp duty’ are seldom far away. Indeed, over the past two decades, it’s been something of a political football – one which has had a profound impact on both housing transactions, and the coffers at the Treasury.
In recent months, it’s been interesting to observe the reception to Greta Thunberg, the 16-year old climate change activist who has been afforded some high-profile forums. The impassioned viewpoints she has shared have earned her legions of fans, albeit no shortage of detractors too. In particular, a speech at the United Nations climate change summit stirred fractious debate.