When it comes to investing, there are numerous questions that need to be asked, and lots of things which need to be properly understood before committing your hard-earned money
The case for business rates reform
Market sentiment towards the recent struggles of the UK high street has been unequivocally negative, which in turn has left many people wondering if this is an indicator that hard times lie ahead for the wider economy. Regularly-used descriptions such as 'bloodbath' for retail performance, and the fall of household-name retail giants have only served to compound such concerns.
Yet, in the context of consumer purchasing power, and the wider economic outlook, it's rather wide of the mark. In reality, consumers are still shopping in their droves - they're just doing it online. Last week, data from the Office for National Statistics showed that nearly a fifth (18.2 per cent) of all retail purchases for the month of July were done online - a new record. Overall retail sales actually increased to the tune of 0.7 per cent last month too, and this broadly continues an improving trend for the sector following a dismal Q1.
The drag of business rates
Nevertheless, there is no doubt that our long-established, and much-cherished high street is under threat in the digital age, with the shadow of online giants such as Amazon looming large. In particular, there is one such headwind which most retailers could do without - one which, on the face of it, seems to be an own goal on the part of Government: business rates.
This controversial system requires tenants who use the property for business purposes to pay a tax, collected by the local authority. The rate of this 'tax' is set by Government and is based on a so-called 'rateable value' - one which is calculated every five years, and determined by the combination of shop rental values and a multiplier (linked to the Consumer Price Index).
Business rates rake in roughly £30bn for the Treasury each year - but for many shop-owners, they are a crippling, and seemingly-arbitrary overhead. For starters, spare a thought for small business, whose business rates bill is entirely unrelated to their profitability, turnover, or even their ability to pay.
Adding to this sense of injustice is the fact that land values are changing at a rapid pace, so to only be assessing these every five years leaves many businesses paying over (or under) the odds for lengthy periods of time. It also creates cliff-edges for businesses upon each revaluation - ones which are difficult to predict, given the volatility of the multiplier.
Then there is the issue of unequal playing fields for brick and mortar versus online retailers. It is quite extraordinary, for example, that Amazon - with 189 sites across England and Wales – was liable for just £38 million in business rates this past year, despite generating £9bn in sales. By comparison, House of Fraser - with 59 UK locations - was on the hook for £36 million in business rates, despite turnover of less than £1bn.
Is there a better way?
Adam Corlett, an economic analyst for the Resolution Foundation, is publishing a report in September which argues that business rates should be replaced by a land value tax - one which would be payable by the landowner, rather than the tenant. This would immediately eliminate the cost of property tax for over 500,000 SMEs, according to the report, with around 92 per cent of businesses seeing their tax bill drop as a result.
The report suggests that this would particularly favour those operating in more deprived areas, with the manufacturing and technology sectors set to reap the most significant benefits.
The key argument underpinning this approach is that business rates disincentive productive investment, as a boost in productive capital will ultimately increase shop rental value, and, consequentially, business rates. By taxing only land value, rather than shop value, such a hurdle for investment is removed.
Time for change
Whether this report gains a lot of traction, and influences policy, remains to be seen. And indeed, there would likely be knock-on effects for tenancy costs of the businesses themselves, as landlords look to cover the cost of this new levy.
Nevertheless, one thing which unites economists and politicians across the board is that something needs to be done. That the business rates system is outdated and unfair is not in dispute. Many believe business rates should simply be scrapped entirely without any form of substitute - something which would blow a hole in the public finances in the short term, but ultimately be a major force for good in the quest to boost the UK's ailing productivity growth.
We have barely scratched the surface of the online revolution, yet the UK boasts key competitive advantages in many, many digital industries. To ensure we build a dynamic economy moving forward, it is vital that we don't resort to unduly suffocating or stifling online businesses in a well-intentioned bid to level the playing fields. Instead, we should welcome our digital prowess.
But giving our much-loved retail stores and small businesses a leg-up by reforming an archaic tax like business rates? Well, that's just a no brainer.
Our website offers information about saving, investing, tax and other financial matters, but not personal advice. If you're not sure whether peer-to-peer lending is right for you, please seek independent financial advice, and if you decide to invest with Lending Works, please read our Key Lender Information PDF first.
For all the resilience the UK economy has shown, there is no doubt that this year's ISA season is set against a backdrop of uncertainty. Whatever the pros and cons, Brexit, and a lack of clarity on what our future economic relationship with the EU will look like, has left us at a crossroads.
The Lifetime ISA (LISA), announced in 2016, would prove to be one of George Osborne’s last flagship gestures to UK savers and investors as Chancellor, eventually launching against a backdrop of anti-climax a year later in April 2017.
As the tax year end approaches, the financial services industry readies itself for a flurry of activity. That's in large part because, with just a couple of months to go, the so-called 'ISA season' is upon us.
Over the last decade, there can be little dispute that the reputation of mainstream banks – and particularly the so-called ‘Big Four’ (HSBC, Barclays, Lloyds and RBS) – is at its lowest ebb.
The peer-to-peer (P2P) lending industry is now regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The regulatory framework has been designed to protect customers and promote effective competition.
Loan underwriting is the process that we undertake to analyse all of the information provided by each loan applicant and their credit file to assess whether or not that applicant meets our minimum loan criteria. As part of that process all data is verified, analysed and summarised to paint a picture of each applicant.
When you earn interest from a regular bank savings account, for example, the bank automatically deducts basic rate tax (currently 20%) before paying your interest. With interest earned from peer-to-peer lending, tax is not deducted automatically so lenders will need to declare their income to HMRC.
With political parties jostling for position amid a series of Elections, and the ongoing spectre of a snap General Election looming large, the Labour Party put forward a policy last week which has proved to be a talking point: increasing the minimum wage to £10 per hour, and extending this to workers under the age of 18.
The starting gun has been fired to seek out Mark Carney's successor as Governor of the Bank of England (BoE), but he will nevertheless remain in his post until January 2020.
The vexing issue of social care, set against a backdrop of an ageing population trying to sustain itself, refuses to go away, and policy ideas invariably prove divisive.
On a daily basis, diligent readers of financial publications consume a wide range of economic data, which act as key performance indicators regarding the state of the UK economy.