Since opening our doors back in 2014, we’ve always prided ourselves on living and breathing two key principles at Lending Works: innovation, and putting the customer first in everything we do.
Are we headed for £2 trillion in national debt?
“We’ll be back in the black by 2020!” was George Osborne’s persistent war cry during his time as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Since the Brexit vote, that ambition has now changed though, and Osborne’s successor Philip Hammond confirmed at the recent Autumn Statement that the new plan is to restore the public finances to balance ‘as early in the next Parliament as possible’.
But what does it all mean? And why do Conservative politicians talk of a falling deficit, while those across the benches claim debt is rising? Who’s right, and who’s wrong?
First and foremost, the important thing to understand is that budget deficits (or surpluses), net borrowing and the national debt are all different things. Once these are better understood, you’ll be better placed to assess the status quo of the country’s finances.
Budget deficit (and, hopefully soon, a surplus)
The current budget deficit (or surplus) is simply the difference between Government receipts (largely from tax) and its everyday expenses such as welfare payments or departmental running costs. This equation generally does not factor in investments (eg: road or rail expansions). In layman’s terms, it is thus the difference between what is spent and what is received – bar the cost of funding investments.
It may sound far-fetched in today’s world, but the UK actually ran a budget surplus for four consecutive years until 2001, and there was a surplus each year between 1947 and 1974. However, this has all changed significantly in the 21st century, with the budget deficit peaking at £103 billion in 2010 (around 7 per cent of GDP). This figure has since declined steadily, dipping under £60 billion for the 2015/16 fiscal year, and is forecast to be below £50 billion in 2016/17.
Although budget deficits and borrowing are linked, the above doesn’t factor in the money Government borrows for investment. So if Government runs a deficit, they will also need to borrow to cover the costs of any investment.
Like the budget deficit, net borrowing has also been on the decline since 2010, when it hit the dizzy heights of £150 billion. A revised forecast in the wake of the EU referendum by the Office for Budget Responsibility – the Government’s fiscal referee – predicted that net borrowing would come in at £68.2 billion for 2016/17. However, there was some good news this week, as figures for Q4 2016 suggested that, if borrowing continues on its current trajectory, this figure will likely be closer to £61 billion.
So, we’re getting things under control then, right? Not exactly…
This, unfortunately, is where it starts to get a bit hairy. The national debt simply refers to the amount of money owed by Government, and is a cumulative total as a result of the spending of successive parliaments over many years. Note that this typically refers to net debt ie: total debt minus the Government’s liquid assets.
And the news on this front is not good. Between the financial crisis of 2008 and 2013, national debt doubled to more than £1 trillion. The resulting recession was thought to be justification enough for such an escalation. But figures released this week showed that the UK’s debt pile currently sits at a staggering £1.7 trillion. In fact, in 2016 alone it rose by more than £250 million every single day, and it is forecast that debt will rise to 87.3 per cent of GDP for 2016/17 (from 84.2 per cent the year before). Given that clearing the deficit has been pushed back into the next decade, it seems safe to assume that the £2 trillion barrier may well be breached in the not-too-distant future.
But remember, even if the budget is in surplus, it doesn’t even necessarily mean that our national debt will begin reducing, given that the cost of borrowing to fund investment could outstrip that of the budget surplus itself!
It isn’t all grim news at least. The economy’s performance after the referendum, which has generally exceeded the expectations of experts on most fronts, has reflected in the public finances too. In the nine-month period to December 2016, central Government tax receipts, National Insurance contributions, corporation tax takings, VAT receipts and income tax receipts all increased markedly compared with the same period the year before.
It’s thus resulted in a far rosier picture than was anticipated by original forecasts, and if the UK economy can continue its current direction of travel, the national debt may well start reducing sooner rather than later.
However, the overall figures are undoubtedly a reality check, and a frightening reminder of the debt this country currently faces; one made all the more expensive to service by virtue of ratings downgrades from the likes of Moody’s and S&P in the wake of the Brexit vote.
The economy has shown remarkable resilience over the past six months, and indications are that it will continue to do so in 2017. But for Chancellor Hammond, whose March Budget speech is now very much on the horizon, it is the current state of our public finances which will concern him most. And if he is to restore fiscal health and sustainability, it is imperative that dealing with our debt retains its place in and around the top of his agenda for many years to come.
Our website offers information about saving, investing, tax and other financial matters, but not personal advice. If you're not sure whether peer-to-peer lending is right for you, please seek independent financial advice, and if you decide to invest with Lending Works, please read our Key Lender Information PDF first.
With the retail sector enduring its fair share of challenges, companies are looking at new ways to attract customers, and drive conversion. In an overcrowded, dog-eat-dog marketplace, with behemoths such as Amazon flexing their muscle, it’s easier said than done.
On 4 June 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) released its new regulatory framework for peer-to-peer lending (P2P); a Policy Statement known as PS19/14. As you might imagine, it's a document which, following a three-month consultation, is a hefty read of no fewer than 102 pages.
For all the resilience the UK economy has shown, there is no doubt that this year's ISA season is set against a backdrop of uncertainty. Whatever the pros and cons, Brexit, and a lack of clarity on what our future economic relationship with the EU will look like, has left us at a crossroads.
In a difficult climate, customer acquisition and lead generation present stern challenges for UK retailers, and a great deal of marketing spend invariably gets directed towards getting feet through the door.
Over the last decade, there can be little dispute that the reputation of mainstream banks – and particularly the so-called ‘Big Four’ (HSBC, Barclays, Lloyds and RBS) – is at its lowest ebb.
The peer-to-peer (P2P) lending industry is now regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The regulatory framework has been designed to protect customers and promote effective competition.
In recent years, we’ve grown accustomed to seeing the UK budget deficit beat expectations each month. Indeed, as recently as January, there was actually a surplus (ie: the level of tax revenue received by the Exchequer exceeded the total spent by the Government on everyday costs such as welfare and public services) – the largest on record for the month of January.
The financial crisis is a bitter memory of what can go wrong when regulators lose control of markets. It seems hard to fathom now, but a little over a decade ago, buyers could acquire mortgages to the tune of 125 per cent of the home’s value (the Northern Rock Together mortgage being one of the most infamous), with only the most lax affordability checks standing in their way.
In the aftermath of the financial crisis back in 2008/09, the Bank of England (BoE) had considerable headroom in terms of monetary policy, and - rightly - it made full use of it.