As a platform, we take great pride in all that we've achieved since opening our doors for business nearly six years ago. We’ve
The rise of Generation Rent - and Generation Landlord
There are a number of statistics which emphasise the growing generational wealth divide in the UK; such as the projection that so-called millennials will be the first in modern history to be poorer than their parents.
So acute is the issue in the UK, that a report by the Resolution Foundation found that our country's under 30s have suffered a reversal in financial fortunes surpassed only by Greece within the developed world since the financial crisis. The study also found that the subsequent pay squeeze since 2008 has been twice as severe on this age category as it has on over 50s.
Yet it is arguably the balance of home ownership which most tangibly illustrates the size of these inter-generational fissures. Moreover, the contrast in fortunes between 'Generation Rent' and 'Generation Landlord'. Staggeringly, around 1 in 30 adults in Britain are now landlords, with rental income accounting for around 3 per cent of GDP. And to illustrate the extent to which the pendulum has swung, recent statistics show that the proportion of homeowners between the ages of 16 and 35 has fallen from 50 per cent to roughly a third in the past decade alone.
Why is this gap increasing?
There are a number of contributing factors, but the one which matters most is the relationship between escalating house prices and wage stagnation. Even as recently as 2005, the average house price in the UK stood at around £150,000. As of 2017, this figure had soared to more than £220,000. This increase has been felt most sharply in London, where the average cost of a property has risen from just under £220,000 in 2004 to over £490,000 today.
Given that the above has coincided with a decade in which real earnings have declined, it becomes obvious why young people are being locked out of home ownership. After all, those under the age of 30 are less likely to have been on the housing ladder by the time the financial crisis struck, and the years since have pushed the bottom rung further away. In fact, it is estimated that the rate of home ownership has fallen from just under 50 per cent to only 20 per cent for those aged 20-29 in the last two decades. For those in their late 20s, the rate of home ownership is just 33 per cent, while the corresponding figure for baby boomers at that age is thought to be in the region of 60 per cent.
Exacerbating this problem has been the conundrum of renting. With homes not being built at a fast enough rate to keep pace with demand, upward pressure is placed on house prices. Higher buying costs and reduced supply mean a greater number of people are forced to rent. This in turn boosts demand for rented properties, which, due to market forces, drives up rental costs. Yet as a result of rent accounting for a greater share of monthly expenses, first-time hopefuls find it ever more difficult to save towards buying a house. All this while, on the other side of the equation, landlords have seen their rental incomes grow.
How can this gulf be addressed?
In fairness, Government has taken steps to deal with the housing crisis, and specifically the age gap in homeownership. The Help-to-Buy scheme - whereby qualifying homebuyers receive a 5-year, interest-free loan to put towards their deposit - has been a relative success, and with the promise of an additional £10 billion being pumped into this initiative, homeownership could become accessible to many more people. Additionally, the Help-to-Buy ISA, which involves a bonus scheme for first-time buyers, has seen significant take-up since its launch, with over a million of these accounts being opened and nearly £2bn saved in the first two years.
Shared ownership is another venture which has been tried. In this instance, individuals can purchase a portion of the home, and rent the remainder from a housing association. Although its popularity appears to be on the decline, it has nonetheless been a viable stepping stone for some.
More regressively, a stamp duty surcharge of 3 per cent on buy-to-let properties (and second homes) introduced in April 2016 has made becoming a landlord less attractive; as have other measures which include removing the so-called 'wear-and-tear' allowance, and a clampdown on landlords writing off interest costs against income tax.
Conversely, the Chancellor scrapped stamp duty for first-time buyers on purchases of up to £300,000 at the last Budget, which represented a clear olive branch to younger voters.
So, will the gap start to close?
Nothing in economics happens in a vacuum, and any number of factors could influence how the housing crisis unfolds from here. It is abundantly clear though that more needs to be done, as all current statistics underscore the disparity of the status quo. If that is allowed to continue, it will only intensify the sense of injustice among young people, and conceivably fester ill-feeling towards their older counterparts.
Yet in a bid to appease the young, constructive solutions do not lie in taking a punitive approach to those of an older disposition. Let us not forget that those over the age of 50 account for half of consumer spending in the UK, and are the crucial engine of growth and prosperity for the economy (not to mention that the vast majority have been prolific taxpayers their entire lives). Damaging their wealth will serve no one, and it is vital that frustration among the young does not lead to policy decisions that result in the pockets of over 50s being unduly raided - directly or indirectly.
There are no easy answers, and even well-intended schemes such as Help to Buy have the unwanted consequence of artificially inflating house prices. Yet the inter-generational homeownership divide is a gaping wound in our society which needs to be addressed. Perhaps radically. However, the steps taken need to be palatable for all.
But of all the big ideas being bandied about, surely straining every sinew to improve on the dismal housebuilding records of successive governments would represent a good and simple start?
Our website offers information about saving, investing, tax and other financial matters, but not personal advice. If you're not sure whether peer-to-peer lending is right for you, please seek independent financial advice, and if you decide to invest with Lending Works, please read our Key Lender Information PDF first.
Since opening our doors back in 2014, we’ve always prided ourselves on living and breathing two key principles at Lending Works: innovation, and putting the customer first in everything we do.
With the retail sector enduring its fair share of challenges, companies are looking at new ways to attract customers, and drive conversion. In an overcrowded, dog-eat-dog marketplace, with behemoths such as Amazon flexing their muscle, it’s easier said than done.
On 4 June 2019, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) released its new regulatory framework for peer-to-peer lending (P2P); a Policy Statement known as PS19/14. As you might imagine, it's a document which, following a three-month consultation, is a hefty read of no fewer than 102 pages.
In a difficult climate, customer acquisition and lead generation present stern challenges for UK retailers, and a great deal of marketing spend invariably gets directed towards getting feet through the door.
Over the last decade, there can be little dispute that the reputation of mainstream banks – and particularly the so-called ‘Big Four’ (HSBC, Barclays, Lloyds and RBS) – is at its lowest ebb.
The peer-to-peer (P2P) lending industry is now regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The regulatory framework has been designed to protect customers and promote effective competition.
In recent months, it’s been interesting to observe the reception to Greta Thunberg, the 16-year old climate change activist who has been afforded some high-profile forums. The impassioned viewpoints she has shared have earned her legions of fans, albeit no shortage of detractors too. In particular, a speech at the United Nations climate change summit stirred fractious debate.
In the 1970s, it was standard fare for governments to manipulate interest rates, particularly in the run-up to a general election. Lower borrowing costs keep a lid on unemployment, and stimulate economic growth.
For close followers of financial forums, one oft-trotted line among brokers is that fixing one's mortgage has seldom been to the retrospective benefit of the homeowner in the past 25 years.